MetLife

MetLife Introduces New Benefits Bundle for Small Business

Posted by Steven Wevodau

Flexible New Combinations of Products Enable Small Businesses to Offer Employees Comprehensive and Cost-Effective Benefits Packages

  • Thursday February 5, 2009, 8:45 am EST

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–MetLife, the largest U.S. life insurer and a leading provider of employee benefits, today introduced the Benefits Bundle for Small Business, a combination of employer-paid coverage and employee-paid voluntary benefits designed to make it easier for small businesses to offer valued employee benefits within flexible price points.

Employers choose to provide a certain level of “core” life insurance, long term disability income insurance or dental benefits by selecting at least two out of three coverages for their eligible employees. Employees are able to “buy up” additional coverage (with no minimum participation requirements) for the selected products at competitive group rates through convenient payroll deduction. The Bundle also includes value-added features, such as will preparation (based on state availability), an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) and travel assistance with identity theft benefits. Employers’ benefits budgeting is made easier with three-year rate guarantees for life and disability insurance coverage and annual rate caps on dental coverage.

MetLife’s Benefits Bundle for Small Business is being made available initially to small businesses with 10-99 employees in the Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Portland and Seattle markets. Coverage is effective beginning March 1, 2009.

“In today’s economy, small business owners are facing greater challenges in managing benefits and administration costs while still seeking to leverage benefits as an effective strategy for retaining valued employees. MetLife’s Benefits Bundle for Small Business provides employers with the flexibility to choose product combinations that work best for them while also offering flexibility on pricing for both them and their employees,” said Robert Bucci, vice president, Small Business Strategy, MetLife. “More choices, rate guarantees, one point of administration for billing and renewals – this value proposition is designed to make it easier for employers to optimize their employee benefits programs in a cost-effective fashion and focus on managing their business for success.”

MetLife is a subsidiary of MetLife, Inc. (NYSE: MET - News), a leading provider of insurance, employee benefits and financial services with operations throughout the United States and the Latin America, Europe and Asia Pacific regions. Through its subsidiaries and affiliates, MetLife, Inc. reaches more than 70 million customers around the world and MetLife is the largest life insurer in the United States (based on life insurance in-force). The MetLife companies offer life insurance, annuities, auto and home insurance, retail banking and other financial services to individuals, as well as group insurance and retirement & savings products and services to corporations and other institutions. For more information, visit www.metlife.com.

 

 

Contact:

MetLife
Karen Eldred, 212-578-9561
keldred@metlife.com

Tags: , ,

Saturday, February 7th, 2009 MetLife - Steven Wevodau, Steve Wevodau - Life Insurance Comments Off

MetLife Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2008 Results - Steven Wevodau

Full Year Premiums, Fees & Other Revenues Increase 11% Over 2007 to $32.9 Billion; Results In Line With December 2008 Investor Day Guidance

 

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–MetLife, Inc. (NYSE: MET - News) today reported fourth quarter 2008 net income1 of $1.0 billion, or $1.20 per share, compared with $1.1 billion, or $1.44 per share, for the fourth quarter of 2007. Operating earnings2 for the fourth quarter of 2008 were $148 million, or $0.19 per share, compared with $1.2 billion, or $1.54 per share, for the prior period.MetLife today also reported full year 2008 net income of $3.1 billion, or $4.14 per share, compared with $4.2 billion, or $5.48 per share, for 2007. Operating earnings for 2008 were $2.7 billion, or $3.67 per share, compared with $4.6 billion, or $6.00 per share, for 2007.

  For the three months

ended December 31,

  For the year

ended December 31,

  2008 2007   2008 2007
  (In millions, except per common share data)
Net income available to common shareholders $954 $1,083   $3,084 $4,180
Net income available to common shareholders per diluted common share

$1.20

$1.44

 

$4.14

$5.48

Operating earnings available to common shareholders2

$148

$1,161

 

$2,736

$4,570

Operating earnings available to common shareholders per diluted common share2

$0.19

$1.54

 

$3.67

$6.00

Book value per diluted common share $27.33 $43.94      
Book value per diluted common share, excluding accumulated other comprehensive income2

$45.29

$42.51

     

1 All references in this press release (other than in any of the tables and in the Non-GAAP and Other Financial Disclosures discussion below) to net income, net income per share, operating earnings and operating earnings per share should be read as net income available to common shareholders, net income available to common shareholders per diluted common share, operating earnings available to common shareholders and operating earnings available to common shareholders per diluted common share, respectively.

2 Operating earnings available to common shareholders, operating earnings available to common shareholders per diluted common share and book value per diluted common share, excluding accumulated other comprehensive income, are not calculated based on generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Information regarding non-GAAP financial measures in this press release and the reconciliation of them to GAAP measures are provided in the Non-GAAP and Other Financial Disclosures discussion below, as well as in the tables that accompany this release.

Full Year 2008 Highlights

 

  • Total premiums, fees and other revenues of $32.9 billion, up 11% over 2007
  • Premiums, fees and other revenues up 19% for Institutional Business and 11% for International over 2007
  • U.S. annuity deposits up 16% over 2007
  • Annual common stock dividend maintained at $0.74 per share

“In 2008, MetLife generated a strong, 11% increase in top line results in what is clearly the most challenging economic environment we have experienced in decades,” said C. Robert Henrikson, chairman, president & chief executive officer of MetLife, Inc. “During the year, we benefited from a flight to quality in the marketplace. Our core businesses continued to grow and we achieved a number of positive results, including higher pension close-out sales as well as strong annuity deposits in both the U.S. and Japan.”

“MetLife’s capital strength, strong ratings and focus on the long-term will continue to set us apart as we move ahead in 2009. These attributes, along with our diversified businesses and investment portfolio, serve us well,” added Henrikson.

Fourth Quarter Segment Overview

All comparisons of fourth quarter 2008 results in the segment discussions below are with the fourth quarter of 2007, unless otherwise noted. Reconciliations of segment net income to segment operating earnings are provided in the tables that accompany this release.

Institutional Business

Institutional Business continued to generate significant top line growth across all of its businesses as total premiums, fees and other revenues grew 18% over the fourth quarter of 2007 to reach $4.2 billion. Institutional Business operating earnings were $272 million, down from $527 million in the prior period due mainly to significantly lower investment income.

Premiums, fees and other revenues in the group life business increased 9% for the quarter due largely to growth in term life premiums. Group life operating earnings were $117 million, up 26% from $93 million as the business continued to experience solid underwriting and investment results, as well as lower expenses.

Non-medical health premiums, fees and other revenues increased 13% over the prior period, due to strong growth in all product lines, particularly in dental, which benefited from both organic growth and a recent dental HMO acquisition. Operating earnings for non-medical health were $71 million, down from $98 million, due primarily to lower investment income.

Retirement & savings premiums, fees and other revenues grew 80% over the fourth quarter of 2007 to $689 million, primarily due to several pension closeout sales in the U.K. as well as higher structured settlement sales. Retirement & savings operating earnings were $84 million, down from $336 million, driven mainly by lower investment income.

Individual Business

Total Individual Business premiums and deposits grew 58% over the prior period as a result of strong growth in fixed annuity deposits. For the quarter, Individual Business had an operating loss of $106 million, compared with operating earnings of $380 million in the prior period. The decline in earnings was primarily due to the increased amortization of deferred acquisition costs and other capitalized items, along with lower fee revenue, resulting from the poor equity market performance in the 2008 quarter.

In the annuity business, total deposits grew 91% over the prior period to reach $7.5 billion as fixed annuity deposits grew from $261 million to $4.1 billion. In addition, variable annuity deposits remained strong at $3.4 billion, down from $3.7 billion in the fourth quarter of 2007. For both fixed and variable annuities, net flows were positive and lapse rates declined.

In the life business, total first year premiums and deposits were $228 million, compared with $307 million. Total life operating earnings were $88 million, down from $181 million due mostly to a decline in investment income.

International Business

In the fourth quarter of 2008, total International premiums, fees and other revenues were $1.0 billion, compared with $1.1 billion in the prior period. The year-over-year performance reflects the negative impact of foreign currency exchange rates in the fourth quarter of 2008. Total operating earnings were $94 million, compared with $193 million in the prior period. The fourth quarter of 2008 includes a one time liability adjustment in the Latin America region. In the fourth quarter of 2007, International’s earnings were positively impacted by a one time liability reduction and related tax benefits (due to pension regulation changes in the Latin America region) of $105 million ($0.14 per share).

In the Latin America region, premiums, fees and other revenues were $496 million, down from $550 million, largely due to lower annuity sales and the effect of foreign currency exchange rates. In the region, earnings were $115 million, down from $166 million, due to the previously mentioned one time benefit in the fourth quarter of 2007.

In the Asia Pacific region, premiums, fees and other revenues (excluding Japan) increased 9% on a constant currency basis. In Japan, annuity deposits were 125 billion yen ($1.3 billion), compared with 139 billion yen ($1.2 billion) in the prior period. Quarterly earnings in the region (excluding Japan) increased to $34 million.

In the European region, premiums, fees and other revenues grew 11% over the prior period to $99 million, reflecting growth in most of the countries in Europe where MetLife operates as well as India. The region had an operating loss of $23 million during the quarter, compared with $1 million in operating earnings in the prior period, reflecting the company’s continued investment in expansion of the business throughout the region.

Auto & Home

Auto & Home operating earnings were $112 million in the fourth quarter of 2008, up 9% from $103 million. In the fourth quarter of 2008, the segment benefited from favorable non-catastrophe claim development related to prior accident years of $27 million, net of income tax, compared with $25 million, net of income tax, in the prior year period. During the 2008 quarter, Auto & Home also experienced lower auto claim frequencies.

Investments

MetLife has a high quality, diversified $322.5 billion general account portfolio. For the quarter, net realized investment gains, net of income tax, were $1.3 billion, including $403 million, net, in credit-related losses and impairments. These credit-related losses are offset by derivative gains of $1.6 billion, net of income tax, which arose primarily from a decrease in interest rates in the fourth quarter. Derivative gains also include other items which primarily offset in the quarter driven by changes in currency, equity and credit spreads.

In the fourth quarter of 2008, variable income was negative and lower than plan by $540 million, or $317 million ($0.40 per share) after income tax and the impact of deferred acquisition costs and other offsets, driven mostly by negative returns from hedge funds and real estate funds.

Corporate & Other

Corporate & Other had an operating loss of $224 million, compared with a $42 million operating loss in the fourth quarter of 2007, primarily reflecting lower investment income.

Corporate Events

Earnings Conference Call

MetLife will hold its fourth quarter and full year 2008 earnings conference call and audio Webcast on Wednesday, February 4, 2009, from 8:00 to 9:00 a.m. (ET). The conference call will be available live via telephone and the Internet. To listen over the telephone, dial (612) 288-0340 (domestic and international callers). To listen to the conference call over the Internet, visit www.metlife.com (through a link on the Investor Relations page). Those who want to listen to the call on the telephone or via the Internet should dial in or go to the Web site at least fifteen minutes prior to the call to register, and/or download and install any necessary audio software.

The conference call will be available for replay via telephone and the Internet beginning at 10:00 a.m. (ET) on Wednesday, February 4, 2009, until Wednesday, February 11, 2009 at 11:59 p.m. (ET). To listen to a replay of the conference call over the telephone, dial (320) 365-3844 (domestic and international callers). The access code for the replay is 980627. To access the replay of the conference call over the Internet, visit the above-mentioned Web site.

Non-GAAP and Other Financial Disclosures

All references in this press release to net income, net income per share, operating earnings and operating earnings per share should be read as net income available to common shareholders, net income available to common shareholders per diluted common share, operating earnings available to common shareholders and operating earnings available to common shareholders per diluted common share, respectively.

Net income available to common shareholders and net income available to common shareholders per diluted common share are defined as Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) net income and GAAP net income per diluted common share less preferred stock dividends, respectively.

The historical and forward-looking financial information presented in this press release includes performance measures which are based on methodologies other than GAAP. MetLife analyzes its performance using so-called non-GAAP measures, including operating earnings, operating earnings available to common shareholders, operating earnings available to common shareholders per diluted common share and operating return on common equity. MetLife believes these measures enhance the understanding and comparability of its performance by excluding net investment gains and losses, net of income tax, and adjustments related to net investment gains and losses, net of income tax, both of which can fluctuate significantly from period to period, and discontinued operations other than discontinued real estate, net of income tax, thereby highlighting the results from operations and the underlying profitability drivers of the business. Operating earnings available to common shareholders and operating earnings available to common shareholders per diluted common share should not be viewed as substitutes for GAAP net income available to common shareholders and GAAP net income available to common shareholders per diluted common share, respectively.

Operating earnings is defined as GAAP net income, excluding net investment gains and losses, net of income tax, adjustments related to net investment gains and losses, net of income tax, and discontinued operations other than discontinued real estate, net of income tax, less preferred stock dividends. Scheduled periodic settlement payments on derivative instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting treatment are included in operating earnings.

Operating earnings available to common shareholders is defined as operating earnings less preferred stock dividends, which are recorded in Corporate & Other.

Operating earnings available to common shareholders per diluted common share is calculated by dividing operating earnings available to common shareholders by the number of weighted average diluted common shares outstanding for the period indicated.

Operating return on common equity is calculated by dividing operating earnings available to common shareholders by average common equity for the period indicated, excluding accumulated other comprehensive income.

  For the three months ended December 31,
  2008   2007
  (In millions, except per common share data)
Net income available to common shareholders $954     $1.20     $1,083     $1.44  
Less: Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax1 1,345     1.69     (125 )   (0.16 )

Less: Adjustments related to net investment
 gains (losses), net of income tax2

(577 )   (0.73 )   21     0.03  
Less: Discontinued operations, net of income tax3 38     0.05     26     0.03  
Operating earnings available to common shareholders $148     $0.19     $1,161     $1.54  
               
Book value per diluted common share     $27.33         $43.94  
Less: Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) per diluted common share     (17.96 )       1.43  
Book value per diluted common share, excluding accumulated other comprehensive income     $45.29         $42.51  

1 Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax, includes gains (losses) on sales of real estate and real estate joint ventures related to discontinued operations of $5 million for the three months ended both December 31, 2008 and 2007, and excludes gains (losses) of $34 million and $44 million for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, from scheduled periodic settlement payments on derivative instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting treatment.

2 Adjustments related to net investment gains (losses), net of income tax, include amortization of unearned revenue and deferred acquisition costs, adjustments to the policyholder dividend obligation and amounts allocable to certain participating contracts.

3 Discontinued operations, net of income tax, exclude gains (losses) from discontinued operations related to real estate and real estate joint ventures.

  For the year ended December 31,
  2008   2007
  (In millions, except per common share data)
Net income available to common shareholders $3,084     $4.14     $4,180     $5.48  

Less: Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax1

1,100     1.48     (564 )   (0.74 )

Less: Adjustments related to net investment
 gains (losses), net of income tax2

(443 )   (0.59 )   (24 )   (0.03 )
Less: Discontinued operations, net of income tax3 (309 )   (0.42 )   198     0.25  
Operating earnings available to common shareholders $2,736     $3.67     $4,570     $6.00  

1 Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax, includes gains (losses) on sales of real estate and real estate joint ventures related to discontinued operations of $8 million and $5 million for the full year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and excludes gains (losses) of $3 million and $164 million for the full year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, from scheduled periodic settlement payments on derivative instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting treatment.

2 Adjustments related to net investment gains (losses), net of income tax, include amortization of unearned revenue and deferred acquisition costs, adjustments to the policyholder dividend obligation and amounts allocable to certain participating contracts.

3 Discontinued operations, net of income tax, exclude gains (losses) from discontinued operations related to real estate and real estate joint ventures.

Forward Looking Statements

This press release may contain or incorporate by reference information that includes or is based upon forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements give expectations or forecasts of future events. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, prospective services or products, future performance or results of current and anticipated services or products, sales efforts, expenses, the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings, trends in operations and financial results.

Any or all forward-looking statements may turn out to be wrong. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Many such factors will be important in determining MetLife’s actual future results. These statements are based on current expectations and the current economic environment. They involve a number of risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. These statements are not guarantees of future performance. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Risks, uncertainties, and other factors that might cause such differences include the risks, uncertainties and other factors identified in MetLife, Inc.’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These factors include: (i) difficult and adverse conditions in the global and domestic capital and credit markets; (ii) continued volatility and further deterioration of the capital and credit markets; (iii) uncertainty about the effectiveness of the U.S. government’s plan to stabilize the financial system by injecting capital into financial institutions, purchasing large amounts of illiquid, mortgage-backed and other securities from financial institutions, or otherwise; (iv) the impairment of other financial institutions; (v) potential liquidity and other risks resulting from MetLife’s participation in a securities lending program and other transactions; (vi) exposure to financial and capital market risk; (vii) changes in general economic conditions, including the performance of financial markets and interest rates, which may affect the company’s ability to raise capital and generate fee income and market-related revenue; (viii) defaults on the company’s mortgage and consumer loans; (ix) investment losses and defaults, and changes to investment valuations; (x) market value impairments to illiquid assets; (xi) unanticipated changes in industry trends; (xii) heightened competition, including with respect to pricing, entry of new competitors, the development of new products by new and existing competitors and for personnel; (xiii) discrepancies between actual claims experience and assumptions used in setting prices for the company’s products and establishing the liabilities for the company’s obligations for future policy benefits and claims; (xiv) discrepancies between actual experience and assumptions used in establishing liabilities related to other contingencies or obligations; (xv) ineffectiveness of risk management policies and procedures; (xvi) catastrophe losses; (xvii) changes in assumptions related to deferred policy acquisition costs, value of business acquired or goodwill; (xviii) downgrades in MetLife’s and its affiliates’ claims paying ability, financial strength or credit ratings; (xix) economic, political, currency and other risks relating to the company’s international operations; (xx) regulatory, legislative or tax changes that may affect the cost of, or demand for, the company’s products or services; (xxi) changes in accounting standards, practices and/or policies; (xxii) adverse results or other consequences from litigation, arbitration or regulatory investigations; (xxiii) deterioration in the experience of the “closed block” established in connection with the reorganization of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company; (xxiv) the effects of business disruption or economic contraction due to terrorism or other hostilities; (xxv) MetLife’s ability to identify and consummate on successful terms any future acquisitions, and to successfully integrate acquired businesses with minimal disruption; (xxvi) MetLife, Inc.’s primary reliance, as a holding company, on dividends from its subsidiaries to meet debt payment obligations and the applicable regulatory restrictions on the ability of the subsidiaries to pay such dividends; and (xxvii) other risks and uncertainties described from time to time in MetLife, Inc.’s filings with the SEC.

MetLife, Inc. does not undertake any obligation to publicly correct or update any forward-looking statement if MetLife, Inc. later becomes aware that such statement is not likely to be achieved. Please consult any further disclosures MetLife, Inc. makes on related subjects in reports to the SEC.

About MetLife

MetLife, Inc. is a leading provider of insurance, employee benefits and financial services with operations throughout the United States and the Latin America, Europe and Asia Pacific regions. Through its subsidiaries and affiliates, MetLife, Inc. reaches more than 70 million customers around the world and MetLife is the largest life insurer in the United States (based on life insurance in-force). The MetLife companies offer life insurance, annuities, auto and home insurance, retail banking and other financial services to individuals, as well as group insurance and retirement & savings products and services to corporations and other institutions. For more information, visit www.metlife.com.

MetLife, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
For the Three Months and Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 (Unaudited)
(In millions)
                     
        Three Months Ended   Years Ended
        December 31,   December 31,
        2008   2007   2008   2007
                     
Revenues                
Premiums   $ 6,498     $ 5,932     $ 25,914     $ 22,970  

Universal life and investment-type product policy fees

    1,236       1,391       5,381       5,238  
Net investment income     3,633       4,720       16,296       18,063  
Other revenues     445       359       1,586       1,465  
Net investment gains (losses)     2,150       (94 )     1,812       (578 )
    Total revenues     13,962       12,308       50,989       47,158  
                     
Expenses                
Policyholder benefits and claims     7,011       6,066       27,437       23,783  
Interest credited to policyholder account balances     1,230       1,391       4,787       5,461  
Policyholder dividends     428       436       1,751       1,723  
Other expenses     3,855       2,885       11,924       10,429  
    Total expenses     12,524       10,778       45,899       41,396  
                     
Income from continuing operations before provision for income tax     1,438       1,530       5,090       5,762  
Provision for income tax     497       447       1,580       1,660  
Income from continuing operations     941       1,083       3,510       4,102  
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax     44       35       (301 )     215  
Net income     985       1,118       3,209       4,317  
Preferred stock dividends     31       35       125       137  
Net income available to common shareholders   $ 954     $ 1,083     $ 3,084     $ 4,180  
                     
                     

Operating Earnings Available to Common Shareholders Reconciliation

             
Net income available to common shareholders   $ 954     $ 1,083     $ 3,084     $ 4,180  
  Net investment gains (losses)     2,100       (163 )     1,771       (844 )
  Minority interest - net investment gains (losses)     -       -       -       -  
 

Net investment gains (losses) tax benefit (provision)

    (755 )     38       (671 )     280  
Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax (1) (2)     1,345       (125 )     1,100       (564 )
  Adjustments related to universal life and investment-type product policy fees   16       2       18       (12 )
  Adjustments related to policyholder benefits and dividends     (123 )     9       (181 )     (156 )
  Adjustments related to other expenses     (778 )     19       (521 )     125  
  Adjustments related to tax benefit (provision)     308       (9 )     241       19  

Adjustments related to net investment gains (losses), net of income tax (3)

    (577 )     21       (443 )     (24 )
Discontinued operations, net of income tax (4)     38       26       (309 )     198  
Operating earnings available to common shareholders   $ 148     $ 1,161     $ 2,736     $ 4,570  
                     
(1) Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax, excludes scheduled periodic settlement payments on derivative instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting treatment of $44 million and $34 million for the three months ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008, respectively, and $164 million and $3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
                     
(2) Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax, from real estate and real estate joint ventures includes discontinued operations of $5 million for the three months ended both December 31, 2007 and 2008, and $8 million and $5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
                     
(3) Adjustments related to net investment gains (losses), net of income tax, includes amortization of unearned revenue and deferred policy acquisition costs, adjustments to the policyholder dividend obligation and amounts allocable to certain participating contracts.
                     
(4) Discontinued operations, net of income tax, excludes gains (losses) from discontinued operations related to real estate and real estate joint ventures.
MetLife, Inc.
Financial Highlights
Unaudited
(In millions, except per common share data or unless otherwise noted)
                     
                     
        At or For the Three Months   At or For the Years
        Ended December 31,   Ended December 31,
        2008   2007   2008   2007
Other Financial Data:                
Net income available to common shareholders   $ 954   $ 1,083   $ 3,084   $ 4,180
Operating earnings available to common shareholders   $ 148   $ 1,161   $ 2,736   $ 4,570
Total assets (billions)   $ 501.7   $ 559.1   $ 501.7   $ 559.1
                     
Individual Business Sales Data:                
Total life first year premiums and deposits   $ 228   $ 307   $ 973   $ 1,063
Variable and Universal life first year premiums and deposits (including COLI/BOLI)   $ 174   $ 252   $ 767   $ 848
Total annuity deposits   $ 7,546   $ 3,958   $ 19,111   $ 16,524
                     
Earnings Per Common Share Calculation:                
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted     793.6     754.1     744.8     762.3
Operating earnings available to common shareholders per common share - diluted   $ 0.19   $ 1.54   $ 3.67   $ 6.00
Net income available to common shareholders per common share - diluted   $ 1.20   $ 1.44   $ 4.14   $ 5.48
MetLife, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
December 31, 2008 and 2007 (Unaudited)
(In millions)
             
             
             
        December 31,   December 31,
        2008   2007
Balance Sheet Data:        
General account assets   $ 380,839     $ 399,007  
Separate account assets     120,839       160,142  
Total assets   $ 501,678     $ 559,149  
             
Policyholder liabilities   $ 289,145     $ 265,976  
Short-term debt     2,659       667  
Long-term debt     9,667       9,100  
Collateral financing arrangements     5,192       4,882  
Junior subordinated debt securities     3,758       4,075  
Other liabilities     46,684       79,128  
Separate account liabilities     120,839       160,142  
Total liabilities     477,944       523,970  
             
Preferred stock, at par value     1       1  
Common stock, at par value     8       8  
Additional paid-in capital     15,811       17,098  
Retained earnings     22,403       19,884  
Treasury stock     (236 )     (2,890 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)     (14,253 )     1,078  
Total stockholders’ equity     23,734       35,179  
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity   $ 501,678     $ 559,149  
MetLife, Inc.
Reconciliations of Net Income Available to Common Shareholders to Operating Earnings Available to Common Shareholders
Unaudited
(In millions)
                     
        Three Months Ended   Years Ended
        December 31,   December 31,
        2008   2007   2008   2007
                     
Total Institutional Operations                
    Net income available to common shareholders   $ 655     $ 459     $ 1,862     $ 1,449  
    Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     369       (86 )     107       (517 )
    Adjustments related to net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     14       18       81       (1 )
    Operating earnings available to common shareholders   $ 272     $ 527     $ 1,674     $ 1,967  
                     
Institutional Operations:                
  Group Life                
    Net income available to common shareholders   $ 33     $ 34     $ 353     $ 355  
    Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     (85 )     (61 )     (167 )     (111 )
    Adjustments related to net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     1       2       3       3  
    Operating earnings available to common shareholders   $ 117     $ 93     $ 517     $ 463  
                     
  Retirement & Savings                
    Net income (loss) available to common shareholders   $ (618 )   $ 211     $ (162 )   $ 613  
    Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     (712 )     (147 )     (1,029 )     (537 )
    Adjustments related to net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     10       22       48       10  
    Operating earnings available to common shareholders   $ 84     $ 336     $ 819     $ 1,140  
                     
  Non-Medical Health & Other                
    Net income available to common shareholders   $ 1,240     $ 214     $ 1,671     $ 481  
    Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     1,166       122       1,303       131  
    Adjustments related to net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     3       (6 )     30       (14 )
    Operating earnings available to common shareholders   $ 71     $ 98     $ 338     $ 364  
                     
Total Individual Operations                
    Net income (loss) available to common shareholders   $ (256 )   $ 348     $ 619     $ 1,357  
    Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     428       (13 )     424       (102 )
    Adjustments related to net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     (558 )     (19 )     (532 )     (61 )
    Discontinued operations, net of income tax     (20 )     -       (16 )     14  
    Operating earnings available to common shareholders   $ (106 )   $ 380     $ 743     $ 1,506  
                     
Individual Operations:                
  Traditional Life                
    Net income (loss) available to common shareholders   $ (106 )   $ 65     $ 36     $ 175  
    Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     (16 )     (33 )     (116 )     (66 )
    Adjustments related to net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     (125 )     (4 )     (161 )     (56 )
    Discontinued operations, net of income tax     (5 )     (1 )     (5 )     1  
    Operating earnings available to common shareholders   $ 40     $ 103     $ 318     $ 296  
                     
  Variable & Universal Life                
    Net income available to common shareholders   $ 72     $ 79     $ 179     $ 234  
    Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     45       4       4       (61 )
    Adjustments related to net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     (8 )     (4 )     3       8  
    Discontinued operations, net of income tax     (13 )     1       (9 )     12  
    Operating earnings available to common shareholders   $ 48     $ 78     $ 181     $ 275  
                     
  Annuities                
    Net income (loss) available to common shareholders   $ (222 )   $ 199     $ 378     $ 934  
    Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     409       25       562       47  
    Adjustments related to net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     (425 )     (11 )     (374 )     (13 )
    Discontinued operations, net of income tax     (2 )     -       (2 )     1  
    Operating earnings available to common shareholders   $ (204 )   $ 185     $ 192     $ 899  
                     
  Other                
    Net income available to common shareholders   $ -     $ 5     $ 26     $ 14  
    Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     (10 )     (9 )     (26 )     (22 )
    Operating earnings available to common shareholders   $ 10     $ 14     $ 52     $ 36  
                     
International                
    Net income (loss) available to common shareholders   $ (33 )   $ 205     $ 580     $ 635  
    Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     (94 )     (5 )     50       38  
    Adjustments related to net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     (33 )     23       8       38  
    Discontinued operations, net of income tax     -       (6 )     -       (9 )
    Operating earnings available to common shareholders   $ 94     $ 193     $ 522     $ 568  
                     
Total Auto & Home                
    Net income available to common shareholders   $ 84     $ 105     $ 275     $ 436  
    Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     (28 )     2       (88 )     10  
    Operating earnings available to common shareholders   $ 112     $ 103     $ 363     $ 426  
                     
Auto & Home:                
  Auto                
    Net income available to common shareholders   $ 29     $ 66     $ 241     $ 287  
    Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     (20 )     1       (61 )     7  
    Operating earnings available to common shareholders   $ 49     $ 65     $ 302     $ 280  
                     
  Homeowners & Other                
    Net income available to common shareholders   $ 55     $ 39     $ 34     $ 149  
    Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     (8 )     1       (27 )     3  
    Operating earnings available to common shareholders   $ 63     $ 38     $ 61     $ 146  
                     
Corporate, Other & Eliminations                
    Net income available to common shareholders   $ 504     $ (34 )   $ (252 )   $ 303  
    Net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     670       (23 )     607       7  
    Adjustments related to net investment gains (losses), net of income tax     -       (1 )     -       -  
    Discontinued operations, net of income tax     58       32       (293 )     193  
    Operating earnings available to common shareholders   $ (224 )   $ (42 )   $ (566 )   $ 103  

 

Contact:

MetLife, Inc.
For Media:
John Calagna, 212-578-6252
or
For Investors:
Conor Murphy, 212-578-7788

Source: MetLife, Inc.

Tags: , ,

Wednesday, February 4th, 2009 MetLife - Steven Wevodau, MetLife Inc., Steve Wevodau - Life Insurance Comments Off

New MetLife Study Provides Insight into the Future of Pension Risk Management

Posted by Steven Wevodau

MetLife U.S. Pension Risk Behavior IndexSM Uncovers Gaps Between Pension Plan Risk Factors Deemed Important and Reported Success in Managing Those Risks

 

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Plan sponsors for the largest U.S. defined benefit (DB) pension plans – which account for $2.3 trillion in assets and cover nearly 42 million plan participants – report that they are focused on only a few risk factors associated with their pension plan. Many also report inconsistent success in addressing the risks they view as most important. These are two of the key findings from the MetLife U.S. Pension Risk Behavior IndexSM (“PRBI”), released today. The first of its kind study polled 168 corporate plan sponsors among the 1,000 largest US defined benefit plans on 18 different risk factors identified by a panel of industry experts and researchers.MetLife designed and fielded this study to encourage public dialogue around pension risk issues. The primary objective of the research is to help plan sponsors develop a new framework for understanding risks, and to explore solutions for mitigating risk exposure.

On an aggregate basis, the plan sponsors surveyed by MetLife ranked “asset allocation,” “meeting return goals,” and “underfunding of liabilities” as most important – factors that are relatively easy to model and measure. The risks ranked least important by plan sponsors are slower to change, more difficult to model/measure and may be less well understood. Among them: “longevity risk,” “mortality risk” and “early retirement risk.”

What’s surprising about the ranking is not the order in which the risk factors appear; this is relatively consistent with the asset centric, “total rate of return” pension plan management model that has prevailed over the past 15 years. What’s unexpected, however, is the range of importance among risk items. The top four risk factors received the vast majority of attention, while the bottom four items received nearly negligible readings. Asset allocation (the most important attribute) was ranked “most important” 54% of the time, while 13 of the remaining 18 factors were picked as “most important” fewer than 30% of the time.

“We believe that the results of this study will help increase awareness among pension plan sponsors about the need to take a more comprehensive view of the risks associated with today’s pensions plans,” said Bill Mullaney, President of MetLife’s Institutional Business division.

Looking separately at the responses of individual plan sponsors, the gap between “most” and “least” important risk factors is even greater. Only 26% of the individual respondents rated a majority of risk items (i.e., more than half) as important. Every respondent did not consider at least five of the 18 risk factors (assigning at least five an importance rating of 0.00%).

“This research suggests that many plan sponsors tend to view and manage risks individually rather than holistically,” said Cynthia Mallett, Vice President of MetLife’s Institutional Business. “Over time, the approach of focusing on some risks – and ignoring others – could have serious repercussions, including unnecessary volatility in earnings and/or cash flow with the potential to adversely affect the ability of the plans to provide retirement security to plan participants. During the next 12 to 24 months, we expect DB plans to develop a broader view of the risks to which their plans may be exposed as demographic forces, regulatory pressures and market volatility combine to make pension plan management more challenging and more transparent.”

Gap Between Importance and Success Scores

In addition to measuring the relative importance of the 18 risk factors, the PRBI tracks how well plan sponsors report that they are managing each area of risk – i.e., the study tracks aptitude as well as attitudes. Looking at these two measures together, the PRBI shows a significant gap between “importance” and “success.” Nearly two-thirds of the study respondents report some degree of inconsistency between importance and success, and about one of every six reports significantly greater discrepancies. Of the 18 risk factors studied, eight were given an above-average importance score but below-average success score or vice versa. Only two of the risk factors had the same ranking for importance and success.

“The research indicates that, for many plan sponsors, risk management is out of alignment. As a result, many plan sponsors may be missing the opportunity to manage the array of risk factors applicable to their plan as optimally as possible,” added Mallett. “Against this backdrop, the potential for incomplete decision-making could be significant. Today’s corporate plan sponsors should be encouraged more than ever to improve the processes by which they identify the full range of short- and long-term risks associated with their plans, and the industry has an opportunity to focus on the importance of developing tools and protocols for managing these risks.”

MetLife U.S. Pension Risk Behavior IndexSM Score: A Baseline Measure with Room for Improvement

By comparing the consistency of plan sponsors’ rankings for importance and success, MetLife developed a PRBI score. The score takes into account the relative importance of each risk and the relative size of each retirement plan. The PRBI score is 76 out 100. This score establishes a baseline for risk management practices against which future changes may be measured.

“The PRBI score leaves significant room for improvement,” remarked Dev Clifford from Greenwich Associates and Richard Dunne from Bdellium, Inc., two researchers who collaborated with MetLife on the PRBI study. “It would be desirable to see every plan sponsor agreeing that they are addressing the risk factors that they believe are most important. While it is unrealistic to expect an index value of 100, a score in excess of 87 is both achievable and desirable.”

Dr. Susan Mangiero of Pension Governance, Incorporated, who also collaborated with MetLife on the groundbreaking research, commented: “This research should broaden awareness among plan sponsors of risk factors outside their present comfort zone, thereby enabling them to have a more balanced understanding of their plan’s dynamics.”

About the Study

The MetLife U.S. Pension Risk Behavior IndexSM was conducted by three research partners – Greenwich Associates, Bdellium Inc. and Pension Governance, Inc. – during the period of June through August 2008. The PRBI consists of a quantitative telephone survey of 168 large plan sponsors (73 of which reported defined benefit assets of more than $1 billion), supplemented by a series of in-depth individual interviews and rigorous statistical analysis. The quantitative portion of the study addressed 18 different investment, liability and business risks faced by DB plan sponsors. These risks were identified by a panel of industry experts and researchers, including: Bdellium Inc., Greenwich Associates and Pension Governance, Incorporated. Greenwich Associates completed the quantitative research for the PRBI, while the detailed analysis and qualitative interviews were conducted by Bdellium Inc. and Pension Governance, Inc. respectively. Respondents for all phases of the research consisted of senior financial professionals whose primary focus included finance, risk management and investment policy. A complete report of the findings for the PRBI (and detailed description of the research methodology) is available at www.metlife.com/pensionrisk.

About MetLife

MetLife is a subsidiary of MetLife, Inc. (NYSE: MET - News), a leading provider of insurance, employee benefits and financial services with operations throughout the United States and the Latin America, Europe and Asia Pacific regions. Through its subsidiaries and affiliates, MetLife, Inc. reaches more than 70 million customers around the world and MetLife is the largest life insurer in the United States (based on life insurance in-force). The MetLife companies offer life insurance, annuities, auto and home insurance, retail banking and other financial services to individuals, as well as group insurance and retirement & savings products and services to corporations and other institutions. For more information, visit www.metlife.com.

In 1921, MetLife was the first company to issue a group annuity contract. Today, the company manages group annuity assets of over $65 billion,1 leads the market2 with over $30 billion in transferred defined benefit pension liabilities1 and provides benefit payments to over one million annuitants every month.3

1) As of December 31, 2007.

2) Based on LIMRA International Stable Value and Funding Agreement Products report, fourth quarter 2007 results—statistics for single premium buyouts and terminal funding.

3) Available through group annuity contracts issued by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Like most annuity contracts, MetLife’s contracts contain limitations, exclusions, and terms for keeping them in force. Please contact your MetLife representative for details.

L0109014558[exp0210][All States]

 

Contact:

MetLife
Toni L. Griffin / Joseph Madden
(727) 862-7006 / (212) 578-3021
tgriffin2@metlife.com
jmadden@metlife.com
or
Katherine Kilpatrick
(212) 584-5475
katherine@blisspr.com

Source: MetLife

Tags: , ,

Monday, January 26th, 2009 MetLife - Steven Wevodau, MetLife Inc., Steve Wevodau - Life Insurance Comments Off

MetLife to Hold Conference Call for Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2008 Results on February 4, 2009

Posted by Steven Wevodau

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–MetLife, Inc. (NYSE: MET - News) announced today that it will hold its fourth quarter and full year 2008 earnings conference call and audio Webcast on Wednesday, February 4, 2009, from 8:00 to 9:00 a.m. (ET) – one day earlier than previously announced.

The conference call will follow MetLife’s issuance of its fourth quarter and full year earnings press release on Tuesday, February 3, 2009, after the market closes. The press release will also be available on the MetLife Investor Relations Web page at www.metlife.com.

The conference call will be available live via telephone and the Internet. To listen over the telephone, dial (612) 288-0340 (domestic and international callers). To listen to the conference call over the Internet, visit www.metlife.com (through a link on the Investor Relations page). Those who want to listen to the call on the telephone or via the Internet should dial in or go to the Web site at least fifteen minutes prior to the call to register, and/or download and install any necessary audio software.

The conference call will be available for replay via telephone and the Internet beginning at 10:00 a.m. (ET) on Wednesday, February 4, 2009, until Wednesday, February 11, 2009 at 11:59 p.m. (ET). To listen to a replay of the conference call over the telephone, dial (320) 365-3844 (domestic and international callers). The access code for the replay is 980627. To access the replay of the conference call over the Internet, visit the above-mentioned Web site.

MetLife, Inc. is a leading provider of individual insurance, employee benefits and financial services with operations throughout the United States and the Latin America, Europe and Asia Pacific regions. Through its subsidiaries and affiliates, MetLife, Inc. reaches more than 70 million customers around the world and MetLife is the largest life insurer in the United States (based on life insurance in-force). The MetLife companies offer life insurance, annuities, auto and home insurance, retail banking and other financial services to individuals, as well as group insurance and retirement & savings products and services to corporations and other institutions. For more information, visit www.metlife.com.

 

 

Contact:

MetLife, Inc.
Media:
John Calagna, 212-578-6252
or
Investors:
Conor Murphy, 212-578-7788

Tags: , ,

Saturday, January 24th, 2009 MetLife - Steven Wevodau, Steve Wevodau - Life Insurance Comments Off

Outlook for Life Insurance Discussed in Wall Street Transcript Insurance Report

posted by Steven Wevodau

67 WALL STREET, New York–January 14, 2009 - The Wall Street Transcript has just published its Insurance issue, a report offering a timely review of the sector to serious investors and industry executives. This 36-page feature contains a roundtable forum and industry commentary through in-depth interviews with top management from 3 firms and 2 analysts. The full issue is available by calling (212) 952-7433 or via The Wall Street Transcript Online.

Topics include: Impact of the credit crisis, Poor equity markets, Variable annuity business outlook, Disability insurance, Increase in claims, Exposure to subprime and derivatives, Default risk, Raising capital, Hoarding cash resources, Cutting expenses, Mergers and acquisition activity , Market volatility, Management quality, Regulatory outlook, Access to TARP funds, Treasury loan to AIG, Credit ratings, Trader’s market and pair trades, Investor interest, Stock picks, Stocks to avoid.

Contents: Roundtable Forum - Life Insurance: Randy Binner, Friedman, Billings, Ramsey Group, Inc.; John Nadel, Sterne Agee & Leach, Inc.; Property-Casualty/Reinsurance: Michael G. Paisan, Stifel Nicolaus & Company, Inc.; Outlook for Property & Casualty Insurance: J. Paul Newsome, Sandler O’Neill + Partners, LP. CEO Interviews (average 2,500 words): Top management from 3 sector firms examine the outlook for their firm and sector. Firms interviewed include: American Financial Group, Inc., Employers Holdings, Inc., Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. Companies include: AIG (AIG); Prudential Financial (PRU); MetLife (MET); Assurant (AIZ); Aflac (AFL); Reinsurance Group of America (RGA); Hartford Financial (HIG); Principal Financial (PFG); Unum (UNM); Genworth (GNW); Lincoln National (LNC); StanCorp (SFG); Allianz (AZ).

In the following brief excerpt from the 36-page report, the roundtable discusses the outlook for the sector and for investors.

TWST: John, as you look back at 2008, what has been the driving force in the life insurance business? Has it really been the financial crisis?

Mr. Nadel: Yes, I think that’s exactly right. The forces have really been twofold in the life insurance sector in my view. They’ve been credit and the poor performance of the equity markets. So every company has had its piece of credit whether it came in the early stages in the form of the subprime residential mortgage-backed securities or if it’s come more recently through the broad decline in valuations across every asset class, from corporates to commercial mortgage-backed securities and the ongoing pressure on residential mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backeds. Every company has had exposure there. And then you’ve got your variable annuity companies, which have had the double-whammy. The impact of credit on their general account investment portfolios and then the impact of the down equity markets both on the earnings off of their variable annuity businesses plus the incremental capital that they need to continue to put up against the variable annuity businesses as the guarantees go further and further in the money.

TWST: Randy, same question, how would you characterize what went on and what drove things for 2008?

Mr. Binner: John certainly laid it out very well. We had identified credit as a huge issue just over a year ago and have worked on it a lot this year by trying to identify who had exposure to what risky assets and, more important, what we thought the losses would be, and as you said, there were definitely stages of it. I’d say that we all understood that it was a levered credit play in a lot of ways with the average leverage of 7 times invested assets to equity. I believe what you saw was that we all handicapped the credit exposures for what the economy supported and then we got past this point maybe a few days after the GSE bailouts in September, when things got a lot worse from a credit and stock market perspective. After that, some of the more levered credit plays became un-investable because the generally higher leverage no longer made the group relatively well insulated, but relatively more exposed. I believe from that point in time we’ve been one of the worst performing verticals in the overall market.

In addition to credit, the deposit-based products and variable annuity guarantees have obviously been the things that pop up when the S&P moves below 900. That is a particular problem for Hartford (HIG) and Lincoln (LNC), but also for MetLife (MET) and Prudential Financial (PRU) to a lesser extent. But, at the end of the day, it all comes back to credit because while the variable annuity exposure may decrease earnings or hit your capital base, you still need that capital base relative to the inevitable credit losses.

Finally, I’d add, the recession exposure of disability insurance products was another area where investors have been cautious and are going to continue to be cautious.

TWST: Where does the disability work into this, Randy?

Mr. Binner: In the last recession, Unum (UNM) most notably, which is the largest disability provider in the US and the UK, saw higher losses coming out of the last recession due to higher claim incidents, but, more objectively, they had more severe or longer claims as they struggled to get people back to work. So, the general idea that incidence of claims will go up in periods where consumer confidence is waning and unemployment is rising is well established. Claims have a tendency to go up due to natural ramifications of a bad economic environment, mental issues, substance abuse, soft tissue problems or possibly fraud. MetLife saw a bit of a crack on that in their benefit ratio last quarter, but we really haven’t seen it from other insurers yet.

TWST: What names are you pointing people to, Randy?

Mr. Binner: Aflac is our top pick. It’s a very solid, protection-focused company. You get a very reliable EPS stream that is not market sensitive, and from a credit perspective they do relatively well. I think I said before that no insurance company is perfect but their more risky exposure is concentrated exposure to bank and financial debt from Europe and Japan. Clearly, there have been issues there but at least you know what names you can monitor and track. Also, 70% of their operations are in Japan, which is giving you a benefit on earnings from the strong yen versus the dollar. And you know, sales are going to be tough for them, but I think that’s priced into the stock. Also, their earnings base is intact and finally, longer term, the idea of selling cancer insurance and supplemental health policies, is a strong secular growth story both in the US and Japan.

Then you move to relative calls like MET and PRU, that we have already covered. Companies like Principal, which is a great franchise and a great company, good management team - they have too much credit exposure relative to their excess capital base in order for me to get comfortable recommending the stock. They may be able to out earn the credit losses, but we continue to caution people on a story like that.

TWST: John, what names are at the top of your list?

Mr. Nadel: I agree on a couple of those with Randy. My top pick is Assurant (AIZ). It’s a specialty insurance company as well. It’s got four or five niche-oriented businesses, and no equity sensitivity in their earnings stream either. They’ve benefited in one of their businesses from the housing crisis. It doesn’t seem like anybody in the insurance business should benefit from a crisis, but their specialty property business has tripled in size in about three years owing to higher mortgage delinquencies and default rates. That’s a company that is well managed. They are really good capital allocators and are extremely cheap on a valuation basis and even on a relative basis to everything. That’s a name that we would highlight as one of our top picks. As Randy indicated when he was talking about Aflac, I don’t agree on the Aflac call, but I would characterize Assurant similar in that it’s a stock that can be long for the long term.

I like MET and PRU a lot. There are not going to be smooth stories here I don’t think, not unless credit improves dramatically, but I do suspect that investors today in those names are going to be well rewarded long term as they come out the other side of however long this lasts. They will come out bigger, stronger with more market share, more opportunity for expense efficiencies and better margins coming out the other side.

The last one that we would highlight is a bit of a specialty company as well and that is Reinsurance Group of America (RGA). It’s a pure play life reinsurance company. It’s not quite as cheap as it was maybe a month or two ago when they raised some equity, but their equity raise was much more about a proactive opportunity to take advantage of some new business opportunities here as a bunch of the primary life insurers are looking for opportunities and ways to relieve capital strain, unlock capital. RGA is one of those companies that by essentially being a partner with the life companies and reinsuring some of their businesses, they can provide that capital relief to the primary companies and also benefit for themselves long term. RGA is a company that we think has significant value, it’s still a buy-rated stock, but it’s performed really well here on a relative basis over the course of the past couple of months. I’d look for an opportunity in the mid-$30s as a great entry point.

The Wall Street Transcript is a unique service for investors and industry researchers - providing fresh commentary and insight through verbatim interviews with CEOs and research analysts. This 36-page special issue is available by calling (212) 952-7433 or via The Wall Street Transcript Online

The Wall Street Transcript does not endorse the views of any interviewees nor does it make stock recommendations.

For Information on subscribing to The Wall Street Transcript, please call 800/246-7673

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Meaning Trumps Money for Those Seeking the Good Life, According to MetLife Mature Market Institute® Study - posted by Steven Wevodau

New Study Uses Consumer Measurement Techniques to Gauge Americans Choices

 

WESTPORT, Conn.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–The adage that money can’t buy happiness is supported analytically by new research demonstrating the importance of having purpose in one’s life and that the most content people focus on the non-financial essentials in their lives, even during difficult economic times. Living the “good life” for middle-aged and older Americans is equated with spending time with family and friends, a previously unquantified finding, according to the MetLife Mature Market Institute’s latest study, Discovering What Matters: Balancing Money, Medicine and Meaning, produced in conjunction with leading author, life coach, and executive educator, Richard Leider. They describe the good life in terms of having health, a financial safety net and the time to do what is important to them.The MetLife report, based on interviews with more than 1,000 Americans between the ages of 45 and 74, explores what brings contentment to those in the second half of life. Respondents, regardless of financial status, maintain that their goals are primarily meaning-based. Further, older respondents focus less on wealth accumulation and more on health and well-being, compared to younger respondents.

Discovering What Matters is accompanied by a workbook and DVD with self-assessment tools, advice and resources. With information on how people can “repack their bags” for life’s journey, these tools are designed to help people let go of “the way things used to be” and to empower them to create new goals for what lies ahead. The materials will also help them adapt to life’s inevitable transitions, both positive and negative. With worksheets and a series of questions relating to lifestyle, environment, health status, finances, relationships and community, people can reset their priorities and learn to achieve a life of purpose and fulfillment. The contents of the workbook were developed by Richard Leider, and are based on his book, Repacking Your Bags: Lighten Your Load for the Rest of Your Life.

“Living the ‘good life’ is not as closely equated with material wealth and physical comfort as we have traditionally believed,” said Sandra Timmermann, Ed.D., director of the MetLife Mature Market Institute. “We found through this research that people who make valuable use of their lives through meaningful work, time to socialize, personal interests and travel, and care for their physical and spiritual health, are more likely to have contentment and purpose in their lives. Having enough money to be comfortable, a different standard for everyone, remains important as well, but it’s not the only, or even most important, focus. This information may inspire Americans to do some life planning, beyond finances, as they start the New Year.”

Richard Leider adds, “The ‘good life’ is an integration of various components in a person’s life for which each component enables the next. Living the ‘good life’ means living in the place you ‘belong,’ with the people you love, doing work that benefits others. Given that people today are living longer, planning for the purpose that they will want to achieve later in life is essential.”

The study data breaks down a number of myths:

1. Myth: The Good Life = material wealth. When asked to select from a list of 13 activities that contribute to living a purposeful life, respondents were most likely to select spending time with friends/family (86%) and taking care of their physical self (63%). These purpose-driven activities become increasingly important as people age.

2. Myth: Happiness = the absence of misfortune. Over the years, most people experience one or more negative “trigger events” such as serious illness, the death of a friend/family member and/or a major financial loss. In fact, 59% of the respondents experienced at least one such negative trigger event over the past 12 months. Positive events, such as the birth of a grandchild or getting a new job, can serve as trigger events. Most trigger events are not under a person’s control, but Americans who live the good life are able to regain happiness through the meaning in their lives.

3. Myth: The Good Life = more (more friends, more money, more health, more activity). The good life comes from balance and alignment of financial security, health and meaningful activity. This usually means “lightening one’s load” by doing away with burdens that lead to unnecessary and/or unproductive activity.

According to the findings, there are five basic types of people defined by the value they place on the core components in their lives - money, medicine, meaning and place: 1) The Balanced Givers, 2) The Meaning-Minded, 3) The Balanced Individualists, 4) The Financially Focused, and 5) The Hyper-Individualists. The highest percentage of those who say they are living the good life are the Meaning-Minded; they are willing to give up money for meaning. The Financially Focused may have a strong vision for the future and engagement in meaningful “work” that provides purpose and fulfillment, but are least likely to say they are at the “good life” level.

The study used a gap analysis technique to characterize individuals in the study. As shown in the following table, more of those who have attained the “good life” are content and optimistic.

     

 

  Gap Analysis
   

Those Living the Good Life (%0-8) N=542

  Those Not Living the Good Life (%0-7) N=459   Gap
I am completely content with my life   71%   25%  

46%

I am highly optimistic about my future   74%   34%  

40%

I am in control of my life   82%   43%  

39%

I am a very happy person   84%   47%  

37%

I look forward to each new day   87%   50%  

37%

I am well-liked by other people   79%   55%   24%
I feel loved by those around me   91%   65%   26%
I have strong values that are my foundation in life   87%   68%   19%

Methodology

A consumer panel of 1,001 individuals between the ages of 45 and 74 participated in the online survey conducted by Chadwick Martin Bailey, a global custom market research and consulting firm. Members of the panel were invited to participate in the survey via email between August and October 2008. Respondents had a minimum household income of $50K or more a year ($25K or more a year if they were retired), and investable assets of $50K or more. These are approximately the average incomes for the U.S. population in those categories. They were categorized into three age groups: age 45-54 (n=333), age 55-64 (n=335), and age 65-74 (n=333). Other demographics were collected as well.

The MetLife Mature Market Institute®

Established in 1997, the Mature Market Institute (MMI) is MetLife’s center on aging and longevity. MMI’s groundbreaking research, gerontology expertise, national partnerships, and educational materials work to expand the knowledge and choices for those in, approaching, or caring for those in the mature market.

MMI supports MetLife’s long-standing commitment to identifying emerging issues and innovative solutions for the challenges of life. MetLife, a subsidiary of MetLife, Inc. (NYSE: MET - News), is celebrating 140 years and is a leading provider of insurance and financial services to individual and institutional customers.

For more information about the MetLife Mature Market Institute, please visit: www.maturemarketinstitute.com.

The full study, Discovering What Matters: Balancing Money, Medicine and Meaning is now available at www.maturemarketinstitute.com under “What’s New.” To order a copy of the printed version of the study, write to: MetLife Mature Market Institute, 57 Greens Farms Road, Westport, CT 06880. A workbook and DVD packet (single copies are free) are also available.

 

 

 

Contact:

DJC Communications
Debra Caruso, 212-907-0051
debra@djccommunications.com
or
MetLife
Shalana Morris, 212-578-1115
snmorris@metlife.com
or
MetLife
Joseph Madden, 212-578-3021
jmadden@metlife.com

Source: MetLife, Inc.

Tags: , ,

Tuesday, January 13th, 2009 MetLife - Steven Wevodau, Steve Wevodau - Life Insurance Comments Off

Four New Quality Resource Guides Added to MetLifes Dental Continuing Education Program - Steven Wevodau

Topics: Adolescent Oral Health, Cosmetic Dentistry, Digital Radiography and Dental Implants

 

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–MetLife announced today that four quality resource guides have been added to its American Dental Association (ADA) and Academy of General Dentistry (AGD) recognized dental continuing education program. The new self-study courses focus on: 1) Adolescent Oral Health: Perspectives for Dental Practitioners, 2) Cosmetic Dentistry, 3) Digital Radiography (second edition), and 4) Restoration of the Single Tooth Dental Implant. The courses are available online at www.metdental.com and can be completed for continuing education credits.“Staying current with new ideas is important and having access to these ideas is critical for those in the dental profession, and MetLife is pleased to provide easy-to-access educational resources that can help keep the dental community current on clinical and professional developments,” said Alan Vogel, DMD, national dental director for MetLife, which is the largest administrator of dental benefit plans among all single commercial carriers, providing dental plan administration for over 21 million people.

The MetLife Dental Advisory Council provides expert guidance for the company’s Quality Initiatives Program, in which educational offerings are developed via needs assessment. The four new MetLife Dental Quality Resource Guides include:

Adolescent Oral Health: Perspectives for Dental Practitioners. Written by Deborah Studen-Pavlovich, DMD, chair and professor of the department of pediatric dentistry at the University of Pittsburgh and Dennis N. Ranalli, DDS, MDS, senior associate dean and professor of pediatric dentistry at the University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine, this guide discusses the physical growth, hormonal changes, changing self-awareness and the expectations of peers and society that all play a role in the expression of oral diseases in adolescents and influence their treatment decisions. The shift in caries risks and patterns, the onset of periodontal diseases, questions regarding third molar removal, tooth whitening and the management of traumatic injuries are among the topics discussed in this guide. In addition, oral health problems associated with the use and misuse of common medications are included. While taking the practitioner on a tour of the oral health problems occurring during adolescence, this guide also highlights multiple opportunities to establish effective strategies for a lifetime of good oral health at a time when the patients focus is on self.

Cosmetic Dentistry. Author Richard D. K. Wilson, DDS, former clinical professor, Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry and private practitioner, defines cosmetic dentistry as “the oral health procedures that improve patient appearance.” As such, there is much more involved than creating an aesthetically acceptable restoration when treating disease or the consequences of traumatic injury. The process of obtaining and documenting the patient’s expectations and arriving at a mutual understanding of what can and what cannot be accomplished is the thread that runs through this guide, including the point when the dentist must decide whether or not they agree to treat or refer. The guide also covers the pertinent aspects of tooth preparation, material selection and the periodontal considerations necessary for successful cosmetic dentistry.

Digital Radiography. Now in its second edition and written by Dr. André Mol, DDS, MS, PhD, assistant professor in the department of diagnostic sciences and general dentistry at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, this guide provides insights into the design of dental offices, including digital radiography, converting your office to digital, or simply assessing your current digital system with a view to a possible upgrade. The guide provides objective information to help address questions such as: What kind of sensor best meets the needs of your practice? Should you have intraoral capability only or intraoral plus panoramic? What about detector sensitivity? What are The Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standards? How best to display images and what about storage and making hard copies?

Restoration of the Single Tooth Dental Implant. Dr. Thomas McGarry, DDS, associate professor at the University of Oklahoma School of Dentistry, adjunct assistant professor at the University of Illinois School of Dentistry and clinical director for the McGarry Implant Institute, is the author of this new guide. As dental implants continue to grow in popularity as the treatment of choice for missing teeth, general dentists must recognize the factors that make their restoration unique. This guide looks at the many factors influencing the ultimate success of a crown supported by a single dental implant and discusses all phases of restoring a single dental implant from case selection through follow-up maintenance care. Clinical photos illustrate the author’s guidelines and a table outlines selection decisions that must be made when designing the final restoration.

As an added benefit for participating in the MetLife Preferred Dentist Program (PDP), participating dentists and hygienists receive continuing education credits for MetLife educational offerings at no charge. Non-PDP dentists and hygienists also have access to the offerings free of charge, but will be assessed a nominal fee for educational credits.

For additional information about MetLife’s dental continuing education program, visit www.metdental.com.

About MetLife

MetLife is a subsidiary of MetLife, Inc. (NYSE: MET - News), a leading provider of insurance, employee benefits and financial services with operations throughout the United States and the Latin America, Europe and Asia Pacific regions. Through its subsidiaries and affiliates, MetLife, Inc. reaches more than 70 million customers around the world and MetLife is the largest life insurer in the United States (based on life insurance in-force). The MetLife companies offer life insurance, annuities, auto and home insurance, retail banking and other financial services to individuals, as well as group insurance and retirement & savings products and services to corporations and other institutions. For more information, visit www.metlife.com.

 

Contact:

MetLife
Shalana Morris, 212-578-1115
snmorris@metlife.com

Source: MetLife

Tags: , ,

Wednesday, January 7th, 2009 Steve Wevodau - Life Insurance Comments Off

Is Your Long-Term-Care Policy Safe?

POSTED BY STEVEN S. WEVODAU

Long-term-care insurance protects against the financial risk of needing extended nursing-home or at-home care. Journal reporter M.P. McQueen, who recently wrote about Conseco’s offloading more than 140,000 long-term-care-insurance policies into an independent trust, tackles some follow-up questions from readers:

Conseco said it needed to transfer its Senior Health unit into a Pennsylvania-supervised trust, the Senior Health Insurance Co. of Pa., because the policies were losing too much money. Regulators said they allowed this because there were no other good choices. Premium increases are expected, regulators acknowledge.

Other insurers have also asked state regulators for rate hikes recently. (Insurance companies are regulated by states.) Prudential is asking for increases averaging 22% for 30,000 long-term care policies sold from 1998 to 2004, the company said. The average annual premium for those policies is currently $1,922. Genworth Financial, the largest issuer of long-term-care policies, and John Hancock Life Insurance, a unit of Manulife Financial, have also asked for boosts; MetLife has asked for increases of 18% for some policies sold from 1998 to 2006. And another long-term care insurance company — Penn Treaty American Corp. of Allentown, Pa., which has 120,000 policies nationwide–is slated to enter receivership next month.

The American Council of Life Insurers and other industry groups say most companies writing long-term care policies remain financially sound. They say the difficulties of one company should not shake consumer confidence in long-term care insurance. Most experts agree, however, that multiple financial-strength ratings downgrades from ratings agencies such as A.M. Best and Standard & Poor’s, or a slip outside the secure range of ratings, are cause for concern. Here are answers to questions posed by readers, and some steps they can take to protect themselves:

  • What happens if my insurer goes bust?In the event that an insurance company fails — which doesn’t happen often — regulators usually try to get another company to take over its policies. But if a company is liquidated, states have guaranty funds to make good on policies up to certain limits.

    Long-term-care insurance policies are guaranteed up to a limit of at least $100,000 in every state, according to the National Organization of Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Associations in Herndon, Va. Some 23 of the 52 guaranty associations cover to the limit of $100,000; six guaranty associations cover policies to at least $500,000, and the rest to a limit of $300,000.

    Policy owners who anticipate receiving reduced benefits for any reason should review their retirement and estate plans with a professional because it may affect their ability to protect assets for their spouse and heirs.

  • What can I do if rising premiums make my policy unaffordable?If you’re facing huge premium increases after many years, your main recourse — unsatisfactory though it may be — is to shrink the policy you own.

    Most companies allow this. You could reduce your maximum benefit, say, from lifetime coverage to five years, or increase the waiting period from 90 days to 120 or more. You could also take a lower daily or monthly benefit, says Karen Smyth, director of product development at Prudential Long-Term Care.

    For policies sold since 1997, companies have had to offer new buyers of tax-qualified plans the option of purchasing a rider that allows for nonforfeiture of benefits. The rider, which adds 6% to 30% to the premium, allows you to stop paying premiums after at least 3 full years and receive a benefit equivalent to the paid-up amount.

    Many states have adopted model regulation from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners or similar rules since 2000 that require insurers to offer owners of long-term care policies the right upon lapse to receive a smaller benefit in return for premiums they’ve already paid or reduce benefits to maintain premium levels, if they receive a “substantial” rate increase, as defined by the law. Some insurers honor this rule even in states where it hasn’t been enacted.

  • What can I do if my insurer’s financial-stability rating declines significantly?If your health is good and you purchased a long-term care policy recently, you can always compare policies from more-financially stable companies and decide what to do after consulting with a licensed agent or qualified financial planner. There is no penalty for replacing a long-term-care policy, though you may receive nothing for the money you already spent and pay a higher price for a new policy. Never cancel any insurance policy, however, until you have been issued a replacement.

    If your policy has been in effect for seven years or more, a premium on a new one with similar coverage would probably cost you 50% to 100% more because of your increased age, says Debra Newman, a director of the Life and Health Insurance Foundation for Education, an industry group. If you’ve since reached an advanced age and your health has worsened, you are not likely to be able to qualify for a brand-new policy, even if you can afford one.

  • What should I look for if I’m shopping for a new policy?Choose only from companies that have the highest ratings from several ratings agencies. Also consider the company’s overall financial condition and its investment holdings, and whether the issuing company has had a history of premium increases, which may portend future ones. Some of this information is available from your state insurance department; link to it from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ Web site. All policies have a 30-day free-look period to make sure you are comfortable with what you bought. Consumer advocates also suggest reviewing a company’s history of complaints, because claims delays and denials often indicate other problems.
  • Tags: , , , , , , , ,

    Wednesday, December 31st, 2008 Steve Wevodau - Life Insurance Comments Off